Central Banks played a prominent role in the 2008 Financial Crisis via their policymaking. However, it led to the birth of Bitcoin (BTCUSD), the first Cryptocurrency to be created. Its determinants, such as decentralisation and peer-to-peer review, possess the potential to pull apart the role of central banks in the modern financial infrastructure. However, despite its advantages, it is not 100 percent adaptable due to many drawbacks.
Founded by Satoshi Nakamoto in 2008, it was the first decentralized digital currency. In 2009, it was released. Unlike fiat money (government-issued currency regulated by issuing government), it has no administrator.
Without an intermediary, it sends money from one user to another via a peer-to-peer network. In this, network nodes verify transactions through cryptography. Then, the transactions are recorded in Blockchain.
It can be kept in a digital wallet and used to purchase goods and services and exchange currencies, including fiat and cryptocurrencies.
A blockchain is a database having a record of transactions. Its unit is named block, and it contains and represents all relevant data about a particular transaction. These blocks are linked to all previous transactions and thus create a chain of transactions.
A bitcoin is created as a reward to individuals for completing a process called blockchain mining. This process authenticates and records the undergoing transaction through cryptography.
The first process involves installing the Bitcoin wallet on devices like mobile or PCs. After this, the Bitcoin wallet will generate a Bitcoin address that can be used once. Then to initiate a payment, the address is to be shared with the persons with whom a person wants to have transactions.
The primary functions of the central banks include maintaining employment, stabilizing prices and regulating inflation, etc., to keep the financial system in motion during crisis times. It is done through their infrastructure, which has a vast network of numerous banks and financial institutions.
They use a variety of tactics to achieve their mandates, which primarily involve manipulating the money supply and interest rates. Changing the money circulating in the economy directly determines the spending by the consumers and thus the economic growth. In addition, they considerably affect the country's imports, exports and overseas investment, with their most significant merit being the ability to build trust in the system.
Economics and technology can explain why Bitcoin is thought of as a substitute for Central Banks. It solves some problems that central banks have arising from their working structure.
Despite the economic independence promised by Bitcoin, it has several catches. No feature accounting for value Unlike gold and silver, which has value for their rarity and tangibility, Bitcoin does not have any such feature standing for its value.
To sum up, Central banks act as the foundation of global financial infrastructure. Most countries use central banks to manage the economic system, which poses several benefits. However, it leads to excessive power on a single authority and many recessions, like in the past.
Currently, both Bitcoin and central banks co-exist, and this condition is more likely to remain in the future. Rather than rejecting Bitcoin, banks should embrace this technology. There is a considerable probability that many central banks will introduce their own central bank digital currencies (CBDCs). As a fact, many countries have taken a step in this direction.